John 7:24

John 7:24 is not a new 24 hour shop. We refer to the Book of John Chapter 7 Verse 24. It is nice to use the “good book” against the NT Government.

The verse goes something like ” judge not by appearance”.

We suggest the NT Government apply this to Zachary Rolfe.

Our observations of this matter suggest that should Rolfe be no longer employed by the NT Government his chances of future employment may be very remote. Circumstances not caused by Rolfe.

The NT Government needs to do the “right thing”.

Our Take On All Things Rolfe

We believe that the NT Government had a very particular narrative. That narrative was to convict Zachary Rolfe of murder. The plan failed.

It appears that the NT Government will stop at nothing to attack Zachary Rolfe. Why? Because Rolfe is not locked up in prison according to what the Gunner Labor Government had planned for him.

The current inquest appears to be the “attack Zachary Rolfe” show. It does not matter what barristers representing the NT Government or other parties say. Perception is very telling. The NT Government has a history of attacking employees they do not like and want to erase.

Does Zachary Rolfe have a right to be angry? We think he does. It is hardly surprising that he might for the want of a better term “be lashing out”.

The people of the NT should hang their head in shame. Why? Incompetent police management that created the entire situation.

If there are any blood stained hands in this matter then look at Jamie Chalker rather than Zachary Rolfe.

Did Chalker Say “Rolfe Must Be Stopped At All Cost”?

Just a few of the things on Chalker’s list!

  1. Breach of police policies and procedures: If a police officer violates the policies and procedures of the police force, they may be subject to disciplinary action, including retirement or dismissal.
  2. Criminal offences: If a police officer is convicted of a criminal offence, this may be grounds for retirement or dismissal.
  3. Misconduct: If a police officer engages in misconduct, such as excessive use of force, corruption, or dishonesty, they may be subject to disciplinary action, including retirement or dismissal.
  4. Mental or physical incapacity: If a police officer becomes mentally or physically unable to perform their duties, they may be subject to retirement.
  5. Insubordination: If a police officer repeatedly disobeys orders or fails to carry out assigned duties, they may be subject to disciplinary action, including retirement or dismissal.
  6. Failure to meet performance standards: If a police officer fails to meet performance standards, such as failing to meet required physical fitness standards, they may be subject to retirement or dismissal.
  7. Discrimination or harassment: If a police officer engages in discrimination or harassment, they may be subject to disciplinary action, including retirement or dismissal.
  8. Conflict of interest: If a police officer engages in a conflict of interest, such as using their position for personal gain, they may be subject to disciplinary action, including retirement or dismissal.
  9. Substance abuse: If a police officer abuses drugs or alcohol, they may be subject to retirement or dismissal.
  10. Loss of licence or certification: If a police officer loses their licence or certification, such as their driver’s licence or firearm certification, they may be subject to retirement or dismissal.

Chalker Now Woke Guru

Jamie Chalker must be using a lot of mouth wash these days. Why? Chalker has become a woke devotee and probably has to clean his mouth out each day after being at the office. Does he really believe what he says? We doubt it. And Chalker will sacrifice anyone who does not sing from the woke hymn book. Burnt at the stake or thrown under the bus, it is woe not to be woke!

Chalker’s Operation Woke

Public Enemy Number One

There you are thinking that we are referring to John Dillinger. 

John Dillinger was known for his daring escapes and evasions of law enforcement, which made him a notorious public figure and caused embarrassment for law enforcement officials. He became one of the most sought after criminals in the United States during the early 1930s, leading to an intense manhunt by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Despite being captured several times, Dillinger was able to escape from jail and continue his criminal activities, which only added to his legendary status. Eventually Dillinger was shot and killed by FBI agents.

We know of another individual who has caused embarrassment for law enforcement officials, the NT’s public enemy number one. A murder trial did not work. The NT Government chucking everything they have to get this guy.


He has caused embarrassment for law enforcement officials.

Chalker A Another PC Plod!

Jamie Chalker likes to dazzle us with his politically correct language while he throws police officers under the bus.

Chalker is indicative of all the upper echelons of the NT Government, they will do anything to ensure their own survival including having someone charged for murder based politically correct reasons. Chalker is now using politically correct “wank speak”. Note he popped in First Nations but has not a clue of the origins of this North American term.

“I’m not sure that the imagery of Australian soldiers, who are here to serve our country, dealing with First Nations people in a way that sees them having to arrest them and place Commissioner Chalker said “functionally broken” services in remote communities over decades were pushing residents into service centres such as Alice Springs. them in police vehicles and alike, is the imagery we really want for Australia,” Commissioner Chalker said. Source ABC

How different things would have been for a certain police officer if had of shot say a person of Thai origins for example.

The elephant in the room again!

The Elephant in the Room - The Menopause - Over The Hilda

The origin of First Nations peoples can be traced back to the original inhabitants of North America, who have lived on the continent for thousands of years. The term “First Nations” is used in Canada to refer to the indigenous peoples of the country, including the Inuit and Métis. The ancestors of these groups migrated to North America from Asia through the Bering Strait, and over time developed distinct cultures, languages, and traditions.

So who is Jamie Chalker talking about? Who is the idiot writing the crap that comes out of Chalker’s mouth?

Once again Australians copying Americans and Canadians!